Questions over advertising 

The Waipā District Licensing Committee appears almost certain to rule against a tide of public opposition to a liquor store and grant an off-licence with conditions.

The committee met in Te Awamutu last week to consider the application from Blue Drops for a bottle store in Cambridge, less than 100 metres from council pensioner housing and a retirement village.

But the issue has raised questions about how such applications should be advertised.

The present requirements were all met – but there are concerns they are outdated, and as result notifications can go unnoticed.

The extent of advertising for the Cambridge application was a notice on a building window and a classified advert in a Stuff publication which contains little local news.

The present notification requirements also apply to such things as vaping and gambling outlets.

A number of groups which objected to the application in Cambridge were only alerted to it thanks to a News story. By the time they objected, the deadline had passed.

The groups included Tainui-owned Māori public health provider Hāpai Te Hauora, St Andrews Retirement Village residents and a nearby motel.

The committee asked questions this week about the number of late objections.

Licensing inspector Mary Fernandez suggested it was because of social media.

The News story ran on July 23 story. There had been no objections prior to that or within 15 days of the advertisement appearing in a Stuff-owned newspaper in May. The objections, except for the ones from the Medical Officer of Health and Police who were told of the application, came after the News story was published.

Last week the Medical Officer of Health was the only ‘official’ objector to the application after Police withdrew its objection.

The applicants’ counsel Pervinder Kaur said her clients met all their obligations under the Act.

She was critical of the Medical Officer of Health who she said had not provided any detail to support its submission against the application.

“The applicant should not have to be guessing what the MOH’s case is. The rules of natural justice required the applicant should know the case it has to answer before the close of evidence.”

The committee adjourned the hearing to allow the applicant time to produce a detailed floor plan.

Grayson said the committee expected to make a decision before Christmas.

More Recent News

Johnathan sets the strategy

You could call Johnathan Tan a general dogsbody and he would not care; he is always up for a challenge. Creating strategy, managing risk and helping businesses grow is what is more important for him….

Interest high in board seats

When nominations closed for the Waipā District Council local elections at midday on Friday, the fears there would not be enough candidates for a genuine election dissipated immediately. A flurry of people had come forward….

Why spatial plans are vital

Kirsty Downey understands why people’s eyes glaze over when she talks about Ahu Ake, Waipā’s spatial plan. “We don’t want this to be a document that sits on the shelf,” says Downey, the council’s Strategy…

Massage marathon a success

Fundraising efforts by the Elite School of Beauty and Spa and Melville community have raised close to $5000 for Tyson Hollran and his family. Tyson, 12, is battling acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. A fundraiser which included…