Questions over advertising 

The Waipā District Licensing Committee appears almost certain to rule against a tide of public opposition to a liquor store and grant an off-licence with conditions.

The committee met in Te Awamutu last week to consider the application from Blue Drops for a bottle store in Cambridge, less than 100 metres from council pensioner housing and a retirement village.

But the issue has raised questions about how such applications should be advertised.

The present requirements were all met – but there are concerns they are outdated, and as result notifications can go unnoticed.

The extent of advertising for the Cambridge application was a notice on a building window and a classified advert in a Stuff publication which contains little local news.

The present notification requirements also apply to such things as vaping and gambling outlets.

A number of groups which objected to the application in Cambridge were only alerted to it thanks to a News story. By the time they objected, the deadline had passed.

The groups included Tainui-owned Māori public health provider Hāpai Te Hauora, St Andrews Retirement Village residents and a nearby motel.

The committee asked questions this week about the number of late objections.

Licensing inspector Mary Fernandez suggested it was because of social media.

The News story ran on July 23 story. There had been no objections prior to that or within 15 days of the advertisement appearing in a Stuff-owned newspaper in May. The objections, except for the ones from the Medical Officer of Health and Police who were told of the application, came after the News story was published.

Last week the Medical Officer of Health was the only ‘official’ objector to the application after Police withdrew its objection.

The applicants’ counsel Pervinder Kaur said her clients met all their obligations under the Act.

She was critical of the Medical Officer of Health who she said had not provided any detail to support its submission against the application.

“The applicant should not have to be guessing what the MOH’s case is. The rules of natural justice required the applicant should know the case it has to answer before the close of evidence.”

The committee adjourned the hearing to allow the applicant time to produce a detailed floor plan.

Grayson said the committee expected to make a decision before Christmas.

More Recent News

Filling in where needed ….

Penelope Roberts is putting her skills where her mouth is and making a difference in people’s lives by volunteering to provide life-changing dentistry. The Waipā-based dentist has just returned from Ruatōria with Trinity Koha Dental…

A council still divided

Woes that thwarted the previous Waikato Regional Council in the debating chamber look set to continue. Nine discretionary committees were selected at the new council’s first meeting – but it took six hours and 15…

Council wants more data

A feasibility study presented to Waipā’s Strategy Planning and Policy committee this week to establish a youth business incubator hub in Te Awamutu lacked key information needed to obtain council funding. The proposal has the…

Ōhaupō changes ahead

Within 30 years Ōhaupō will be a small town growing to the north and Karāpiro will have a new school in a thriving village hub. The suggestions are two of several scenarios in Ahu Ake,…